thesis/bib: add paper about containers/namespaces

src/docs/thesis.bib

@@ -3,18 +3,26 @@ Any changes to this file will be lost if it is regenerated by Mendeley.
 
 BibTeX export options can be customized via Options -> BibTeX in Mendeley Desktop
 
-@article{Felter2014,
-abstract = {IBM Research Report Isolation and resource control for cloud applications has traditionally been achieve through the use of virtual machines. Deploying applications in a VM results in reduced performance due to the extra levels of abstraction. In a cloud environment, this results in loss efficiency for the infrastructure. Newer advances in container-based virtualization simplifies the deployment of applications while isolating them from one another. In this paper, we explore the performance of traditional virtual machine deployments, and contrast them with the use of Linux containers. We use a suite of workloads that stress the CPU, memory, storage and networking resources. Our results show that containers result in equal or better performance than VM in almost all cases. Both VMs and containers require tuning to support I/O-intensive applicaions. We also discuss the implications of our performance results for future cloud architecture.},
-author = {Felter, Wes and Ferreira, Alexandre and Rajamony, Ram and Rubio, Juan},
-doi = {10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095802},
-file = {:home/steveej/.local/share/data/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Felter et al. - 2014 - An Updated Performance Comparison of Virtual Machines and Linux Containers(3).pdf:pdf},
-isbn = {9781479919574},
-journal = {Technology},
-keywords = {cloud computing,performance,virtualization},
-pages = {171--172},
-title = {{An Updated Performance Comparison of Virtual Machines and Linux Containers}},
-url = {http://domino.research.ibm.com/library/CyberDig.nsf/papers/0929052195DD819C85257D2300681E7B/{\$}File/rc25482.pdf},
-volume = {25482},
+@article{Menage2007,
+abstract = {While Linux provides copious monitoring and control options for individual processes, it has less support for applying the same operations efficiently to related groups of processes. This has led to multiple proposals for subtly different mechanisms for process aggregation for resource control and isolation. Even though some of these efforts could conceptually operate well together, merging each of them in their current states would lead to duplication in core kernel data structures/routines. The Containers framework, based on the existing cpusets mechanism, provides the generic process group- ing features required by the various different resource controllers and other process-affecting subsystems. The result is to reduce the code (and kernel impact) required for such subsystems, and provide a common interface with greater scope for co-operation. This paper looks at the challenges in meeting the needs of all the stakeholders, which include low overhead, feature richness, completeness and flexible groupings. We demonstrate how to extend containers by writing resource control and monitoring components, we also look at how to implement namespaces and cpusets on top of the framework.},
+author = {Menage, Paul B},
+file = {:home/steveej/src/github/steveej/msc-thesis/papers/Adding Generic Process Containers to the Linux Kernel.pdf:pdf},
+journal = {Proceedings of the Ottawa Linux Symposium},
+pages = {45--58},
+title = {{Adding Generic Process Containers to the Linux Kernel}},
+url = {http://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2007/ols2007v2-pages-45-58.pdf},
+year = {2007}
+}
+@article{Fink2014,
+abstract = {Docker is a relatively new method of virtualization available natively for 64-bit Linux. Compared to more traditional virtualization techniques, Docker is lighter on system resources, offers a git-like system of commits and tags, and can be scaled from your laptop to the cloud.},
+author = {Fink, John},
+file = {:home/steveej/src/github/steveej/msc-thesis/papers/Docker - a Software as a Service, Operating System-Level Virtualization Framework.pdf:pdf},
+journal = {Code4Lib},
+number = {25},
+pages = {3--5},
+title = {{Docker: a Software as a Service, Operating System-Level Virtualization Framework}},
+url = {http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/9669},
+volume = {1},
 year = {2014}
 }
 @book{Utrecht2006,
@@ -33,6 +41,29 @@ url = {http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/{~}dolstra/pubs/phd-thesis.pdf},
 volume = {56},
 year = {2006}
 }
+@article{Felter2014,
+abstract = {IBM Research Report Isolation and resource control for cloud applications has traditionally been achieve through the use of virtual machines. Deploying applications in a VM results in reduced performance due to the extra levels of abstraction. In a cloud environment, this results in loss efficiency for the infrastructure. Newer advances in container-based virtualization simplifies the deployment of applications while isolating them from one another. In this paper, we explore the performance of traditional virtual machine deployments, and contrast them with the use of Linux containers. We use a suite of workloads that stress the CPU, memory, storage and networking resources. Our results show that containers result in equal or better performance than VM in almost all cases. Both VMs and containers require tuning to support I/O-intensive applicaions. We also discuss the implications of our performance results for future cloud architecture.},
+author = {Felter, Wes and Ferreira, Alexandre and Rajamony, Ram and Rubio, Juan},
+doi = {10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095802},
+file = {:home/steveej/.local/share/data/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Felter et al. - 2014 - An Updated Performance Comparison of Virtual Machines and Linux Containers(3).pdf:pdf},
+isbn = {9781479919574},
+journal = {Technology},
+keywords = {cloud computing,performance,virtualization},
+pages = {171--172},
+title = {{An Updated Performance Comparison of Virtual Machines and Linux Containers}},
+url = {http://domino.research.ibm.com/library/CyberDig.nsf/papers/0929052195DD819C85257D2300681E7B/{\$}File/rc25482.pdf},
+volume = {25482},
+year = {2014}
+}
+@book{Sarton1975,
+author = {Sarton, George},
+doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-33138-6},
+file = {:home/steveej/src/github/steveej/msc-thesis/papers/A Computing History Primer.pdf:pdf},
+isbn = {0882751727 (o.c.)},
+pages = {145},
+title = {{Introduction to the history of science.}},
+year = {1975}
+}
 @inproceedings{Reshetova2014,
 abstract = {The need for flexible, low-overhead virtualization is evident on many fronts ranging from high-density cloud servers to mobile devices. During the past decade OS-level virtualization has emerged as a new, efficient approach for virtualization, with implementations in multiple different Unix-based systems. Despite its popularity, there has been no systematic study of OS-level virtualization from the point of view of security. In this report, we conduct a comparative study of several OS-level virtualization systems, discuss their security and identify some gaps in current solutions.},
 archivePrefix = {arXiv},
@@ -49,24 +80,3 @@ title = {{Security of OS-level virtualization technologies}},
 volume = {8788},
 year = {2014}
 }
-@book{Sarton1975,
-author = {Sarton, George},
-doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-33138-6},
-file = {:home/steveej/src/github/steveej/msc-thesis/papers/A Computing History Primer.pdf:pdf},
-isbn = {0882751727 (o.c.)},
-pages = {145},
-title = {{Introduction to the history of science.}},
-year = {1975}
-}
-@article{Fink2014,
-abstract = {Docker is a relatively new method of virtualization available natively for 64-bit Linux. Compared to more traditional virtualization techniques, Docker is lighter on system resources, offers a git-like system of commits and tags, and can be scaled from your laptop to the cloud.},
-author = {Fink, John},
-file = {:home/steveej/src/github/steveej/msc-thesis/papers/Docker - a Software as a Service, Operating System-Level Virtualization Framework.pdf:pdf},
-journal = {Code4Lib},
-number = {25},
-pages = {3--5},
-title = {{Docker: a Software as a Service, Operating System-Level Virtualization Framework}},
-url = {http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/9669},
-volume = {1},
-year = {2014}
-}