context: describe stack clash/guard page

src/docs/thesis.bib

@@ -3,15 +3,11 @@ Any changes to this file will be lost if it is regenerated by Mendeley.
 
 BibTeX export options can be customized via Options -> BibTeX in Mendeley Desktop
 
-@article{Matz2009,
-author = {Matz, M and Hubicka, J and Jaeger, a and Mitchell, M},
-file = {:home/steveej/src/steveej/msc-thesis/docs/System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement Draft Version 0.99.7.pdf:pdf},
-isbn = {013877630X},
-pages = {1--128},
-pmid = {2477614},
-title = {{System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement}},
-url = {papers2://publication/uuid/CD8D5668-B1F5-4FE3-BAD8-25F1E589A9E5},
-year = {2009}
+@misc{TheStackClash,
+author = {Advisory, Qualys Security},
+file = {:home/steveej/src/steveej/msc-thesis/docs/stack-clash.txt:txt},
+title = {{The Stack Clash}},
+url = {https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt}
 }
 @article{Lattner2005,
 abstract = {The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure (http://llvm.cs. uiuc.edu) is a$\backslash$nrobust system that is well suited for a wide variety of research$\backslash$nand development work. This brief paper introduces the LLVM system$\backslash$nand provides pointers to more extensive documentation, complementing$\backslash$nthe tutorial presented at LCPC.},
@@ -125,6 +121,16 @@ file = {:home/steveej/src/github/steveej/msc-thesis/docs/DRAFT$\backslash$: Syst
 title = {{DRAFT: System Programming in Rust: Beyond Safety}},
 year = {2017}
 }
+@article{Matz2009,
+author = {Matz, M and Hubicka, J and Jaeger, a and Mitchell, M},
+file = {:home/steveej/src/steveej/msc-thesis/docs/System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement Draft Version 0.99.7.pdf:pdf},
+isbn = {013877630X},
+pages = {1--128},
+pmid = {2477614},
+title = {{System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement}},
+url = {papers2://publication/uuid/CD8D5668-B1F5-4FE3-BAD8-25F1E589A9E5},
+year = {2009}
+}
 @article{Chisnall2015,
 abstract = {We propose a new memory-safe interpretation of the C ab-stract machine that provides stronger protection to benefit security and debugging. Despite ambiguities in the specifi-cation intended to provide implementation flexibility, con-temporary implementations of C have converged on a mem-ory model similar to the PDP-11, the original target for C. This model lacks support for memory safety despite well-documented impacts on security and reliability. Attempts to change this model are often hampered by as-sumptions embedded in a large body of existing C code, dat-ing back to the memory model exposed by the original C compiler for the PDP-11. Our experience with attempting to implement a memory-safe variant of C on the CHERI ex-perimental microprocessor led us to identify a number of problematic idioms. We describe these as well as their in-teraction with existing memory safety schemes and the as-sumptions that they make beyond the requirements of the C specification. Finally, we refine the CHERI ISA and abstract model for C, by combining elements of the CHERI capabil-ity model and fat pointers, and present a softcore CPU that implements a C abstract machine that can run legacy C code with strong memory protection guarantees.},
 author = {Chisnall, David and Rothwell, Colin and Watson, Robert N M and Woodruff, Jonathan and Vadera, Munraj and Moore, Simon W and Roe, Michael and Davis, Brooks and Neumann, Peter G},